Shadow Unit
June 17, 2013, 11:52:56 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: That joke only works if you have a chalkboard.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: wolverine, or Wolverine?  (Read 2183 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
el_jefe
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 778


Nom nom nom


View Profile WWW
« on: January 18, 2008, 11:20:07 am »

Quote
"It looks like a duck and walks like a duck," Frost replied, "but it quacks like a wolverine."

She said, "You can't find the bullet because there isn't one. There never was."

Since this is Frost, we can assume that she is referring to a corpse of some sort. Something that had a wound resembling a bullet impact. Now you can get a similar trauma without a bullet, just stab someone with something of a similar diameter very, very quickly. But at this point, the comic geek that I used to be wondered what it would look like if the X-man known as Wolverine "popped" a claw on someone during the time that he didn't have his adamantium improvements.

*goes back into his parents basement*
Logged

I carry a gun because I can't fit Sol Todd in my pocket.
ebony14
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 415


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2008, 01:44:50 pm »

I'm thinking of a story I once read, where a cyborg killed by throwing ball bearings through people. No cyborgs here, but the wound would be somewhat bullet-esque. Of course, the implication I got from Frost's comment was that there was no projectile at all, which makes me wonder. The Mythbusters disproved the ice bullet, but if someone had the strength to throw it into someone, wouldn't it melt after impact?
Logged
Fox
Newbie
*
Posts: 17


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2008, 12:02:42 am »

There's an urban legend which states that whacking someone really hard with a spike heel will produce a wound not unlike that of a .22; I suspect this is very dubious, but amuses me.
Logged
Giles
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2008, 09:10:13 am »

Entry wound for a bullet is generally unremarkable, its the trauma the wound causes inside and upon exit wich are pretty remarkable.

if we simply want to simulate the entry wound then a screwdriver.
Logged
dedoc
Newbie
*
Posts: 10


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2008, 06:03:17 pm »

Entry wound for a bullet is generally unremarkable, its the trauma the wound causes inside and upon exit wich are pretty remarkable.

if we simply want to simulate the entry wound then a screwdriver.

That won't work terribly well. There are micro-scale patterns of injury, even with small caliber/low velocity bullets, which are reasonably known to forensic pathologists. A patrolman won't see them, and a detective might simply think the wound was from a distant firearm, low velocity, small caliber. But a competent ME will twig fairly quickly. ...
Logged
Razorsmile
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 53


Works as well for the Anomaly , I figure.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2008, 12:00:15 pm »

Seriously overthinking this. Our unsub/Anomaloid kills yaks (and people) with mind bullets. QED Full Stop End.
Logged

Remember: You are a soldier in the data war. It is important that you use only real bullets. - Jon Carroll
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!